Provider abstraction
Integrate model aliases and supported request formats while retaining the provider-specific features your application needs.
ENGINEERING
01 / MODEL ROUTINGBring model access behind a consistent engineering layer. We design gateway integrations that connect application needs with approved providers, operating policies and useful evidence.
SYSTEM VIEW
Routing should reflect the task and its constraints. A lower-priced model is useful only when it meets the required quality and operating policy.
Resolve the application identity, tenant and permitted model set.
Use explicit task metadata or a tested classifier to identify the workload.
Constrain candidates by capability, quality, region, budget and latency.
Choose a target, apply timeouts and retry only within the allowed boundary.
Policy-controlled outcomes
A model validated for repeatable, well-defined tasks.
A model approved for the task’s reasoning or domain requirements.
A permitted private or self-hosted endpoint where required by the data policy.
Observe quality, latency, cost and policy decisions. Keep sensitive payloads out of routine logs.
WHAT WE ENGINEER
Integrate model aliases and supported request formats while retaining the provider-specific features your application needs.
Define timeout, retry and fallback criteria. Alternative models must satisfy the same data and capability constraints; streaming and tool execution need explicit failure handling.
Apply workload-level rate, token and concurrency limits, with budgets and alerts where supported. Track usage against an agreed cost baseline.
Compare candidate models on representative tasks. Use controlled traffic splits and rollback criteria before changing the default route.
GATEWAY INTEGRATION
agentgateway offers model abstraction and virtual-model strategies, including weighted, conditional and failover routing. Kong brings model routing and AI policies into its gateway ecosystem. We assess the supported version and deployment mode against your requirements.
Semantic routing, lowest-latency selection and priority fallback solve different problems. We choose explicit policies where they are sufficient and add classification only when the benefit is demonstrated. Optional plugins, licences and external services are assessed during design.
ENGINEERING QUESTIONS
It can use cost as an input, but cost alone is a poor acceptance criterion. We establish which models pass the workload’s quality, capability and data requirements, then optimise within that approved set.
No. A fallback can also be unavailable or unsuitable. We define bounded retries, compatible alternatives and an explicit error path, then test how the application behaves when every permitted target fails.
A shared gateway and model aliases can reduce provider coupling. Request formats, streaming, tool calls and model behaviour still need compatibility testing before a provider change.
LET’S ENGINEER WHAT COMES NEXT
Bring us a workload, a technical constraint or an architecture that needs a second look. We will help define a practical next step.
Discuss your engineering prioritiesArchitecture advice, focused implementation and support for your engineering team.